A new analysis of 211 studies suggests that workers' compensation or other
financial compensation is often associated with poorer patient outcomes after
surgery. The research was published in the April 6 issue of the Journal of
the American Medical Association.
Explains Dr. Robert H. Haralson of the American Academy of Disability Evaluating
Physicians, "Essentially, the worker is getting paid for being sick, and
it's hard for anyone who's being paid to get sick to get well."
He said the syndrome has been acknowledged for many years and continues to frustrate
doctors.
The analysis looked at studies from the United States, Australia, Europe, the
United Kingdom, and other countries. Researchers found that workers who receive
compensation for on-the-job injuries were almost four times more likely to have
poorer long-term medical outcomes than workers who were not compensated. Lead
researcher Dr. Ian Harris says this doesn't necessarily mean comp recipients
with lingering symptoms are lying. "These patients believe themselves to
be worse off, but what causes that belief poses another question." He points
to a phenomenon called symptom expectation in which victims of car accidents
in the United States and Australia expect to experience neck pain after an accident,
and they do. But in other countries and cultures, such pain is not as prevalent
after an accident.
Harris says doctors can help by encouraging injured workers with some back
pain to return to work, while avoiding tasks that worsen the symptoms. This
helps keep those injured from falling into a "disability cascade"
syndrome.